Tag Archives: writing

These days, employers care more about your abilities than your degree

Leave a reply

Regardless of the extent of one’s preparation for a job interview, it is likely that candidates will encounter questions that prove unexpectedly challenging. Classic examples include “What is your greatest weakness?” or “Why have you decided to leave your current position?” This article draws on expert insights to provide evidence-based strategies for navigating such complex interview scenarios.

While difficult interview questions persist, their nature has evolved in response to broader shifts in recruitment practices. Recent interview experiences may reveal that questions have moved away from traditional prompts such as “Where do you see yourself in five years?” Instead, contemporary interviews increasingly focus on:

  • Problem-solving abilities
  • Adaptability in the face of change
  • Communication and collaboration skills

This evolution is closely linked to the global transition towards skills-based hiring, particularly evident in 2025. Employers are prioritising demonstrable competencies over formal educational attainment, seeking tangible evidence of what candidates can achieve rather than relying solely on academic credentials.

This article provides a comprehensive analysis of:

  • The transformation of interview processes, including the proliferation of artificial intelligence and structured interview formats
  • The emergence of new question types relevant to the 2025 employment landscape
  • Practical guidance on responding to challenging questions through the enhanced STAR+L framework (Situation, Task, Action, Result, plus Learning)
  • Targeted recommendations for migrant professionals, with particular attention to the unique challenges posed by global interview conventions.

For example, individuals grappling with questions such as:

  • “Describe a time you failed.”
  • “Do you possess local work experience?”
  • “How do you approach conflict resolution?”

will find this article a valuable resource for developing responses that are both confident and authentic, thereby enhancing their prospects in a competitive, skills-oriented job market.

The Transition to Skills-Based Recruitment

The hiring practices of businesses have evolved due to a shift in the talents they prioritise, necessitating a corresponding change in preparation methods. The primary distinction is that businesses increasingly prioritise skills above mere qualifications.

As reported by Education Daily (October 2025), 45% of corporations worldwide have eliminated degree prerequisites for specific positions. Prominent businesses such as Google, Apple, and IBM no longer necessitate formal degrees, prioritising demonstrable competencies instead. This illustrates a wider trend referred to as skills-based recruiting, wherein practical abilities are prioritised over formal education.

A global change is occurring throughout all continents, including Africa, Asia, the Americas, Australia, Europe, Canada, and Japan. Technical and Further Education (TAFE) programs and micro-credentials are gaining prominence, institutions are offering short stackable certificates, and businesses are requiring candidates to demonstrate their abilities rather than merely discuss them.

Your résumé, examples, and interview narratives must unequivocally illustrate your capabilities, the outcomes you have attained, and the value you have contributed to tangible scenarios.

The Function of Artificial Intelligence and Virtual Interviews

Interviews have become increasingly computerised. Numerous corporate employers are currently utilising AI-driven solutions to evaluate candidates via one-way video recordings or structured question exams. Although these systems seek to mitigate bias, research (Adam, 2023; Liang, Weixin et al., 2023; & Peart, 2025) indicates that AI tools may inadvertently disadvantage those with pronounced accents or non-native English proficiency.

What implications does this hold for migrant job seekers?

Clarity, confidence, and preparedness are important. Rehearse your responses on video. Reduce your pace, enunciate your remarks, and concentrate on explicit illustrations.

Contemporary in-person interviews have adopted more formal approaches, wherein all candidates are posed identical behavioural questions and evaluated using rubrics to guarantee equity. This is a favourable advancement; nonetheless, it necessitates that your responses be specific, pertinent, and quantifiable.

Current Employer Expectations

Hays Australia and other recruitment analyses indicate that in 2025, employers prioritise behavioural and scenario-based probes above theoretical questions (Peart, 2025).

They seek to understand:

  • What is your approach to problem-solving?
  • How do you adjust to changes?
  • Are you capable of effective collaboration and clear communication?
  • What outcomes have you achieved?

These questions aim to evaluate your reasoning rather than your recollection of answers.

Employers seek demonstrable evidence of problem-solving, communication, and adaptability skills, which are more indicative of actual performance than degrees or certifications.

What are the prevalent interview questions in 2025? If you are unable to simply acquire a blog containing the top 20 questions and memorise your responses, well here are some, but I consistently advise my clients and emphasise during my interview preparation sessions that it is essential to analyse the job advertisement, comprehend the employer’s expectations, and then formulate narratives that demonstrate your relevant skills.

If they enquire about flexibility, consider a particular instance in which you shown adaptability in the workplace and describe the resulting effect. The questions may be phrased differently; however, the story can remain unchanged.

Emerging Interview Questions Anticipated in the Coming Years

This year, the following types of questions are increasingly prevalent in Corporate interviews:

  • Tell me about a time you solved a problem with limited resources.
  • How do you adapt when priorities change suddenly?
  • What technology or systems have you used to make your work easier?
  • How do you explain complex information to someone without your background?
  • What’s something new you have learned recently, and how did you apply it?
  • Describe a time when your team disagreed. How did you handle it?
  • Tell me about a time things didn’t go to plan.
  • How do you work with people from different backgrounds or communication styles?
  • What achievement are you most proud of, and what difference did it make?
  • When have you influenced a decision without being the manager?

These questions require self-awareness and reflection, not perfection.

Challenging interview questions frequently encountered by migrants

Working with hundreds of migrant professionals, I have noticed a few questions that consistently cause stress, not because of language, but because of confidence and mindset.

“Why do you want to work here?” Many respond, “To get local experience.” Instead, talk about shared values, the company’s projects, or how your international experience adds perspective.

“Do you have local experience?” Reframe it. “While I am new to the Dutch market, I have managed global teams and clients, and I understand how to adapt quickly and deliver results.”

“Why did you leave your previous job?” Focus on growth and contribution, not dissatisfaction.

“How do you handle conflict?” Explain calmly: “I prefer to address issues early, directly and respectfully, and focus on solutions rather than blame.”

These responses demonstrate maturity, professionalism, and alignment with European (Dutch) workplace expectations.

Strategies for responding to challenging questions with confidence

The STAR Method (Situation, Task, Action, Result) is still the best structure to use, but in 2025 and beyond, I recommend adding one more letter, L for Learning. Employers today want to see that you don’t just perform tasks, you reflect, learn, and grow.

Let’s take one example:

Question: Tell me about a time you made a mistake.

Answer structure:

Situation: Explain the context briefly.

Task: Outline what you were responsible for.

Action: Describe what you did and how you handled it.

Result: Share the outcome.

Learning: Reflect on what you learned and what you do differently now.

For example:

“In a previous role, I underestimated how long stakeholder approvals would take, and we missed a deadline. I took responsibility, mapped out a new process, and introduced early check-ins. It improved delivery times by 20% in future projects. It taught me the importance of managing expectations early, something I have carried into every project since.”

This type of answer shows accountability, communication, and problem-solving – three of the most valued competencies in 2025 and beyond.

Preparing for Modern Interviews

To prepare effectively for interviews in 2025 and beyond:

  1. Build three strong achievement stories. Use metrics, outcomes, and clear examples.
  2. Practise on video. Notice how you sound, how long you take, and whether your message is clear.
  3. Translate your overseas experience into the local language, highlight achievements, not duties.
  4. Ask thoughtful questions such as: “How does your company support diversity or inclusion?” “What does success look like in this role after six months?” “How does the team collaborate across time zones or cultures?”
  5. End with confidence. Say, “I really enjoyed learning about this opportunity. I believe my experience in [specific skill] and my results in [specific project] would bring real value to your team.”

Conclusion

In 2025 and beyond, interviews are no longer about tripping you up; they are designed to uncover how you approach challenges, communicate with others, and find solutions. The reassuring truth is that you already possess these capabilities—particularly if you have successfully navigated the complexities of relocating, adapting, and advancing your career in a new country. That strength and adaptability are among your most powerful professional qualities.

Your task now is to share your unique journey in a way that resonates with employers in your current context—articulating your experiences clearly, confidently, and backed by solid evidence. The landscape of the workplace has evolved, and those who master its new language will unlock a wealth of opportunities. If you can communicate your story effectively, you are not just keeping pace with change—you are set to thrive in the future world of work.

References

Adam, Z. (May 10, 2023). AI models fail to reproduce human judgement about rule violations. MIT News.

Liang, W., Yuksekgonul, M., Mao, Y., Wu, E., & Zou, J. (2023). GPT detectors are biased against non-native English Writers. Patterns, 4(7), 100779.

Peart, N. (2025). How Interviews Have Changed in 2025 & How to Answer Some of the Toughest Interview Questions. JobSpeak Academy.

Book Review: “Zombies in the Academy: Living Death in Higher Education”

Leave a reply

Introduction

“Zombies in the Academy: Living Death in Higher Education,” edited by Andrew Whelan, Ruth Walker, and Christopher Moore, is not simply an anthology of essays concerning the creatures that have pervaded popular culture for decades. It is, instead, a bold multidisciplinary investigation into how the zombie metaphor may elucidate, critique, and potentially revolutionise our comprehension of contemporary academic life. This review examines the book’s key ideas, the organisation and manner of its contributions, and the distinctive, occasionally disconcerting insights it offers into the current situation of higher education.

Concept and Framework

The book is organised as an edited collection, comprising a series of pieces by various scholars who analyse different facets of the “zombie” metaphor in relation to academia. The zombie cliché, commonly found in horror films and video games, is here applied to the academic setting, where the distinctions between life and death, productivity and stagnation, as well as innovation and conformity, are perpetually redefined. Each essay utilises the lexicon of the undead to examine topics including bureaucracy, burnout, precarity, and the commercialisation of education.

The compelling nature of “Zombies in the Academy” lies in its rejection of a solitary or simplified interpretation of the metaphor. The contributors regard the zombie as a “polysemic figure”, with its meaning varying according to context. The zombie represents, at times, the exhausted faculty member, the apathetic student, the unthinking administrator, and the institution itself—an entity that trudges forward, deteriorating, using resources, yet never fully perishes or rejuvenates. The book’s versatility serves as both its strength and its difficulty; readers may feel simultaneously exhilarated and unsettled by its unwillingness to reconcile the contrasts it reveals.

The Themes and Arguments

  • Bureaucratic Fatigue and Academic Burnout: Numerous essays analyse the fatigue that permeates various university settings. The depiction of the zombie – exhausted, unyielding, incapable of repose – serves as a metaphor for the academic worker ensnared in the apparatus of perpetual committees, grant proposals, and performance assessments. The book examines, through vivid anecdotes and theoretical analysis, how institutional frameworks reduce dynamic intellectuals to become shadows of their former selves, perpetually pursuing yet never achieving intellectual fulfilment.
  • Precarity and the Casualisation of Academic Employment
  • The metaphor of the “living dead” is applied to individuals occupying the marginal realms of academia: adjuncts, sessional speakers, and graduate students. Their existence is characterised by ambiguity, transience, and a feeling of being neither within nor beyond the institution’s confines. The book compellingly links the perpetual quest for a permanent job with the zombie’s unquenchable appetite, which remains eternally unsatisfied.
  • Student Disengagement and the Demise of Critical Thought: A particularly disturbing element of the book is its portrayal of students as zombies – not as mindless consumers, but as victims of increasingly instrumentalist educational methodologies. The authors contend that the impetus to commodify education, quantify all aspects through metrics, and impose inflexible curricula deprives students of the curiosity and involvement that previously characterised the university experience. They question whether the academy can regain its critical acuity or if it will continue to progress in a state of “living death”.
  • The Corporatisation and Standardisation of the Academy
  • Through incisive research, the book reveals the ascent of managerialism, performance metrics, and the infiltration of corporate models into the core of the university. The zombies represent not merely individuals, but comprehensive systems – mechanisms that emphasise efficiency over creativity, conformity over disagreement, and survival over flourishing. Readers are prompted to evaluate whether the academy, now extensively dominated by neoliberal principles (such as the New Public Management), can achieve authentic rejuvenation.

Style and Approach

“Zombies in the Academy” is composed in an approachable yet intellectually demanding manner, integrating personal narrative, cultural critique, and scholarly theory. The editors have effectively curated a volume that is both accessible and profoundly engaged with the philosophical enquiries posed by its subject. The articles exhibit a range of tones, from sardonic and amusing to gloomy and incisive, illustrating the complex nature of their central metaphor.

The book’s transdisciplinary nature is another notable advantage. Contributors originate from sociology, literature, cultural studies, education, and philosophy, interlacing elements from various disciplines to construct a tapestry that is intricate and meaningful. The allusions to popular culture – films, television, and games – are not superfluous; rather, they enhance the reader’s comprehension of the zombie’s role in the communal imagination and within the confines of the institution.

Critical Reflections

Like any edited edition, the book’s merits are occasionally diminished by inconsistencies in the quality and depth of individual contributions. Certain chapters are remarkably innovative, presenting novel languages and conceptual frameworks for contemplating academic life; others may succumb to conventional grievances or jargon. Nonetheless, the collection’s general cohesion is preserved, mostly because of the editors’ meticulous arrangement and insightful introduction.

One significant issue is the potential overuse of the zombie metaphor, despite its productive nature. Occasionally, the reader may question whether the metaphor obscures the genuine challenges encountered by individuals in higher education. Does the vocabulary of the undead genuinely encapsulate the intricacies of burnout, precarity, and disengagement, or does it unintentionally diminish their significance? The book confronts these questions directly, redirecting them to the reader and encouraging additional discourse.

Impact and Relevance

Notwithstanding these reservations, “Zombies in the Academy” is a crucial intervention at a time when universities globally, such as Dalhousie University in Canada, are encountering unparalleled challenges. The COVID-19 pandemic, persistent austerity measures, and evolving political factors have exacerbated the challenges outlined within its pages. By emphasising the significance of metaphor and rejecting simplistic answers, the book provides readers with a framework for critically examining the circumstances surrounding the production and dissemination of information.

The volume’s significance transcends the academic sphere. Individuals employed in various areas, including healthcare and public service, may recognise the diagnosis of bureaucratic fatigue and systemic stagnation as disturbingly familiar. The book contributes to a wider discourse regarding the future of employment, creativity, and communal existence in the twenty-first century.

Conclusion

“Zombies in the Academy: Living Death in Higher Education” is a bold, thought-provoking, and even disconcerting examination of the modern university. The book employs the imagery of the undead to examine and rethink the circumstances of academic life. The articles compel readers to confront the “living death” jeopardising the vitality of education, while simultaneously presenting instances of hope – occasions when innovation and dissent penetrate the gloom of conformity.

This work is indispensable for those intrigued by the future of higher education or the capacity of metaphor to elucidate social reality. It is not for the timid; the shadow of the zombie is always close to lived experience. Within its pages, one discovers not just despair but also the potential for rejuvenation – a summons to oppose the forces that threaten to render us inert and to restore the academy as a locus of authentic thought, engagement, and transformation.

Reference

Whelan, A., Walker, R., & Moore, C. (Eds.). (2013). Zombies in the Academy: Living Death in Higher Education (1st ed.). Intellect. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv36xw78w