Tag Archives: economy

A Concise Overview of the 2024 Macroeconomic Landscape.

In 2024, elections were held in over 40 countries, encompassing more than 4 billion individuals globally. The ramifications of election outcomes were frequently substantial. The move to the right and the ascent of populism were only evident in financial markets in the United States. Trump’s triumph in such context elicited enthusiasm in U.S. equity markets. The S&P 500 increased by approximately 10% following the November election results, although other global regions experienced very modest gains or slight declines throughout the same timeframe. Cryptocurrencies experienced a significant increase following Trump’s electoral victory. For the inaugural occasion, the value of one Bitcoin exceeded $100,000.

Throughout 2024, the enthusiasm for AI persisted across major technology firms, with Nvidia as the most notable exception, with a return of +178% in US dollars. This resulted in the top 10 companies in the MSCI All Countries World Index being exclusively comprised of BigTech firms, all of which are US-based except for Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company, collectively representing over 20% of the total value of this predominant equity benchmark. Such concentrations have undermined several arguments in favour of passive investing. The dominance of passive investors over the majority of active investors has grown sufficiently to withstand any further losses resulting from these concentrations. Active equity investors had no grievances in 2024 either. Notwithstanding unsatisfactory assessments on the progress of European industry and the Chinese economy specifically, stock markets ascended throughout all areas. The Emerging Markets, comprising 27% Chinese shares, experienced an increase last year following a lacklustre 2023.

Government bond investors cannot express the same sentiment. In contrast to the predictions of most macroeconomists, the 10-year Dutch government bond yield increased from 2.35% to 2.59% last year. Consequently, premium European government bonds saw only a slight growth last year. Consequently, the appreciation of Euro-denominated corporate bonds by up to 4.7% may solely be attributed to a reduction in their credit risk premiums. The additional remuneration for the heightened risk associated with corporate bonds has thus diminished significantly.

It is often asserted that stock markets can typically manage only one or two issues concurrently. In 2024, the evolution of inflation and its influence on short-term interest rates was observed once more. In the Netherlands, inflation remained at +4.1% year-on-year at the end of December, although in Europe, it decreased to over 3.2% during the same period, and in the US, it reached 2.7% until November.

Global central banks reacted by reducing their short-term interest rates, despite the absence of necessity. Short-term interest rates must be reduced to avert a recession; nevertheless, globally, the majority of central banks do not anticipate a recession in their nations before 2025.  Nonetheless, elevated interest rates are detrimental to governments burdened by escalating national debts. Interest expenses are consuming a growing portion of the nation’s annual budgets; yet politicians appear to regard this mostly as a future issue, as it adversely affects their electoral support in the short term.

Additional factors, including escalating global geopolitical tensions, the emergence of numerous authoritarian leaders worldwide, growing protectionism, and natural disasters attributed to climate change, were not reflected in stock prices in 2024; however, they were evident in the 27% increase in gold prices and the over 6% appreciation of the US dollar.

It is a striking paradox that the majority of individuals express concern over communications from their governments and banks urging them to accumulate emergency provisions and increase cash reserves at home, while the stock markets continue to stagnate. The overwhelming majority of macroeconomists maintain an optimistic outlook for 2025. Let us anticipate that their assertions will be validated in practice.

Why are some countries rich and others poor, and what can be done about it?

The question, imbued with childlike curiosity, is paramount in the field of economics. The answer is contingent upon the quality of government. The work by Acemoglu, Johnson and Robinson (2001) titled, “The colonial origins of comparative development: an empirical investigation”, largely corroborates this assertion. The study is fundamental in understanding the influence of historical institutions on contemporary economic inequalities among nations. The authors examine how various European colonization strategies resulted in the formation of different institutions, which have had enduring effects on economic development (The Economist, October 19th, 2024, p.65). Countries that developed “inclusive institutions” – which uphold the rule of law and property rights – have gradually achieved prosperity, while those that created “extractive institutions” – which, as the laureates described, “squeeze” resources from the broader populace to advantage the elites – have suffered from consistently low economic growth.

The model proposed by the laureates for elucidating the conditions under which political institutions are established and modified comprises three components. The first issue pertains to the distribution of resources and the locus of decision-making authority within a society, whether it resides with the elite or the populace. The second point is that the people occasionally possess the capacity to exert influence by mobilizing and intimidating the ruling elite; hence, power within a society encompasses more than mere decision-making authority. The third issue is the commitment problem, indicating that the sole solution is for the elite to relinquish decision-making authority to the population.

The empirical evidence from the Korean and Colonial experiments indicates that variations in economic institutions, rather than location or culture, are the principal determinants of long-term economic performance. The theoretical framework elucidates how commitment issues, the menace of political losers, and the interdependence of efficiency and distribution culminate in the formation of inefficient economic institutions that favor the powerful.

Key Points:

European Mortality Rates: The study uses historical data on European mortality rates as an instrument to estimate the impact of institutions on economic performance. In regions where Europeans faced high mortality rates, they established extractive institutions rather than settling.

Institutional Persistence: These extractive institutions persisted even after the colonies gained independence, significantly affecting their economic outcomes.

Economic Impact: The authors find that institutions have a large effect on income per capita. Once the effect of institutions is accounted for, geographical factors like being in Africa or near the equator do not significantly impact income levels.

Furthermore, the disparity in wealth between countries is a complex issue influenced by various factors. Here are some key reasons:

Institutions: Effective political and economic institutions play a crucial role. Countries with inclusive institutions that promote education, innovation, and investment tend to be more prosperous. In contrast, extractive institutions that concentrate power and wealth in the hands of a few often hinder economic growth (the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, 2024).

Geography: Geographic factors such as climate, natural resources, and location can impact a country’s economic development. For example, countries in temperate zones often have more fertile land and better access to trade routes (TEDED).

Education and Health: Higher levels of education and better healthcare contribute to a more productive workforce. Countries that invest in these areas typically see higher economic growth (Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis).

Trade and Markets: Open markets and trade policies can drive economic growth by allowing countries to specialize and benefit from comparative advantages. Conversely, protectionist policies can stifle economic progress4.

Historical Factors: Historical events, such as colonization, can have long-lasting effects on a country’s economic trajectory. The institutions and policies established during colonial times often persist and influence current economic conditions (the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, 2024).

Culture and Social Norms: Cultural attitudes towards work, savings, and investment can also affect economic outcomes. Societies that value education and hard work tend to be more prosperous (John Kay, 2005).

Understanding these factors can help in formulating policies to reduce poverty and promote economic growth.

Strategies for navigating these disparities

Videos to watch:

References

Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S., & Robinson, J.A. (2001). The Colonial Origins of Comparative Development: An Empirical Investigation. American Economic Review, 91 (5): 1369–1401.DOI: 10.1257/aer.91.5.1369.

Batabyal, A.A. (June 24, 2022). Wealth of nations: Why some are rich, others are poor – and what it means for future prosperity. Retrieved from https://theconversation.com/wealth-of-nations-why-some-are-rich-others-are-poor-and-what-it-means-for-future-prosperity-185116 (Accessed 23 October 2024).

Romer, P.M., (2018). NobelPrize.org. Nobel Prize Outreach AB 2024. Retrieved from https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/economic-sciences/2018/romer/facts/ (Accessed Wed. 23 Oct 2024).

Solow, R. M., (December 8, 1987). Growth theory and after. Prize Lecture. Retrieved from https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/economic-sciences/1987/solow/lecture/ (Accessed 23 October 2024).

Vezzoli M, Valtorta RR, Gáspár A, Cervone C, Durante F, Maass A, et al. (2024) Why are some countries rich and others poor? Development and validation of the attributions for Cross-Country Inequality Scale (ACIS). PLoS ONE 19(2): e0298222. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0298222.