Programme 2020

The core team members of the Responsible Business, Peacebuilding and Education Project (RB-PEP) met to discuss and plan the activities for the new year, 2020. Below you will find some activities we shall be engaged in 2020.

DATEACTIVITYMODERATORS & PERSONS RESPONSIBLE
10 March 2020Roundtable #1: In-country implementation of the Voluntary Principles on Security & Human Rights (VPSHR) within diverse contexts: challenges, lessons and opportunitiesDr. Daniel Agbeko Dr. Remy Nyukorong Wendy Wilson Prof. Kwame Karikari
20 June 2020Roundtable #2: Mitigating Gender-Based Violence risks in natural resources sectorDr. Remy Nyukorong Dr. Mavis B.S. Mensah Patricia Taft Prof. Ans Kolk or Prof. Rosemond Boohene  
23 October 2020Roundtable #3: Perspectives on Responsible Business practices in challenging contextsDr. Remy Nyukorong Dr. Daniel Agbeko Christopher Opoku Nyarko Prof. Dan Ofori  
18 November 2020Roundtable #4: Addressing Human Trafficking & Forced Labour in supply chainsDr. Mavis Benneh Serwah Mensah Dr. Daniel Agbeko J.J. Messner Prof. Abednego Feehi Okoe Amartey  

My new Post

What Science Entrepreneurs Need to Know

Science-based entrepreneurs can find the help they need to succeed from “behind the scenes” intermediary organizations (Clayton, Feldman & Lowe, 2018). For instance, the authors said intermediaries can help science entrepreneurs with:

  • intellectual property protection
  • navigation of clinical trials
  • negotiation of technical standards for information, Internet, and equipment technologies
  • refining ideas and business plans, reducing the transaction costs of commercialization
  • financing, either directly through subsidies, or indirectly by making introductions to other sources
  • coordinating networks and partnerships
  • providing introductions to more established and influential business leaders, mentors, or partners

“A successful theater performance requires a large support cast working behind the scenes, without which the show would not go on. Just as the audience focuses their attention on the dramatic action happening on stage, the commercialization of science tends to orient its gaze toward the innovative technology and its enabling star, the entrepreneur” (Clayton et al., 2018). “But as with theater, diverse entities work behind the scenes to support the necessary processes of founding, managing, and scaling a new scientific venture. In the commercialization of science, the least visible players are intermediary organizations—entities that operate in the void between the scientific discovery and the ultimate realization of value from commercialization, providing specialized services and access to equipment and resources beyond the reach of startup firms.”

Paige Clayton, Maryann Feldman and Nichola Lowe, all of University of North Carolina, in their paper “Behind the scenes: Intermediary organisations that facilitate science commercialisation through entrepreneurship,” describe the five intermediary types in three broad categories as follows:

Services

1. University technology transfer offices
2. Professional service firms, including legal, accounting, and real estate
3. Networking, connecting, and assisting organizations

Physical space

4. Incubators, accelerators, and coworking spaces

Financing

5. Venture capital firms, angel investors, public funding programs, and crowdfunding platforms

Intermediaries “are critical for launching entrepreneurial firms,” Feldman said. Intermediaries are available around the world, but usually work in specific regions. “As people become more interested in entrepreneurship, we’ve seen these intermediary organizations proliferate.”

“It’s important for entrepreneurs who are commercializing science to consider the full menu of their options. There is no correct recipe. It’s a matter of being creative with local ingredients,” she added.

Here are the basics:

University technology transfer offices (TTOs)

  • Engage faculty in the development process
  • Work with businesses to license technology
  • Provide incentives for invention disclosure

“Private universities tend to be more efficient in licensing than public universities, while universities with a medical school are less efficient in licensing,” the authors noted.

Professional service firms (PSFs)

  • Give advice about intellectual property and business formation strategy
  • Act as dealmakers
  • Reduce transaction costs

PSFs vet proposals for new companies and connect founders to resources and networks in entrepreneurial communities, which can help cut transaction and search costs. PSFs, according to Clayton and Colleagues (2018), “are especially important to academic entrepreneurs as they provide information related to law and accounting, as well as services such as product testing that might not be accessible to them through their established academic networks,” The authors further said that “Local attorneys provide initial advice on patent protections and scope affecting the decision to start a company. Accountants and investment bankers provide a similar function reducing the impact of information market failures on startups. … Real estate brokers and managers familiar with equity investing also reduce transaction costs of obtaining finance. Accountants and investment bankers provide a similar function reducing the impact of market failures on startups.”

Networking, connecting, and assisting organizations

  • Facilitate networking and mentoring
  • Influence policy through agenda setting

These organizations “serve networking support roles for entrepreneurs, coordinating local organizations and programs by bringing together public and private entities, and serve agenda-setting roles for policy and practice. Motivated to serve a public purpose, these organizations exist to address network failures.”

“One example of such an organization is the North Carolina Biotechnology Center, established by the North Carolina legislature in 1981 as a nonprofit 501c3. … Another example of a successful quasi-public, coordinating, and networking program is the San Diego CONNECT program. This intermediary was founded in 1985 as a bottom-up effort of entrepreneurs, supported by economic development officials, to connect industry to academia and advance local entrepreneurship and the commercialization of academic science. … Not-for-profit organizations with more limited government involvement also offer a portfolio of topical programs to respond to local needs and contribute to the commercialization of science through entrepreneurship. One example is the nonprofit Council for Entrepreneurial Development (CED), one of the nation’s first membership organizations dedicated to new firm support by providing networking assistance, mentorship, entrepreneurial education and training, and identification of capital sources.

“Both nonprofit and quasi-public programs can operate at multiple scales. Nonprofits, such as SCORE and America’s Small Business Development Centers (SBDC), have a national reach and receive federal funding from the Small Business Administration (SBA),Clayton and his colleagues noted. Both SCORE and SBDC offer training and mentoring.

Incubators, accelerators and coworking spaces

“Commercialization of science requires physical workspace, laboratory space, clean rooms, and advanced equipment. Incubatorsaccelerators, and coworking spaces provide entrepreneurs access to physical facilities at below market rates, and with preferential terms,” according to Clayton and Colleagues (2018). “The co-location of physical facilities allows for the circulation of ideas. Incubators, accelerators, and coworking spaces may be affiliated with universities or alternatively operate as public, for-profit, or nonprofit entities.”

Incubators

  • Offer affordable space
  • Provide support services
  • Generate revenue for incumbent firms

“First-generation incubators focused only on offering affordable space, while second-generation incubators added knowledge-based business support services. Third-generation incubators began to add networking support and serve earlier-stage companies, focusing more on selection and quicker tenant turnover, in an effort to make profits,” the authors noted. “While the earliest incubators were publicly financed, for-profit and corporate incubators emerged.”

Accelerators

  • Offer intensive programming
  • Accelerate milestones
  • Invest in exchange for equity

“Although accelerators have been described as a ‘new generation incubator model,’ they differ from incubators on a number of variables including duration, business model, selection, and mentorship,” said the authors. “Firms are typically provided with a small investment in return for an equity share. Selection into accelerators is highly competitive, which sends a quality signal to outside investors. Accelerators make extensive use of seminars for education about entrepreneurship. Furthermore, mentorship is intense in accelerators and a multitude of relationships can exist between the accelerator and the startup, including direct investment, help with finding additional investment, and partnering in pilot production and distribution. Accelerators also stress finding the value proposition for the customer, which can be especially beneficial for scientists-turned-entrepreneurs, who tend to focus on the scientific aspects of their firm.

“Accelerator funders are more like venture capitalists in that they invest in a group of firms, while only expecting to receive large returns on just a few ventures. Therefore, they will accept earlier investments overall, which is important for commercializing science.”

Coworking spaces

  • Provide flexible, less-structured programming
  • Offer space for social interaction
  • Facilitate networking and peer mentoring

“Coworking spaces—a low-rent, alternative workspace purported to offer a fun and informal atmosphere—are another new phenomenon in the workspace intermediary field. Coworking spaces are distinguished from earlier shared office facilities by their emphasis on social interactions, aesthetic design and management by cashed out entrepreneurs and potential investors. They are found in hotspots of activity and range from small operations to national organizations such as WeWork, and large firms, such as Microsoft and Google,” the authors observed. “There are three types of coworking space users: freelancers, microbusinesses, and people working for themselves or for companies external to the space. Knowledge exchange through collaborative relationships only occurs when the coworking organization encourages such collaboration—co-location alone does not foster collaborative relationships.”

Venture capital (VC) firms

  • Provide multistage, benchmarked financing
  • Are motivated to increase firm performance

VCs “operate as partnerships that raise money from institutional and individual investors. They may be corporate, bank-owned, private, or government-sponsored. Private-sponsored VC is less common in European countries than in the U.S. In Asian countries, however, VCs do not have the same relationships with universities as in the U.S., and VCs often invest in earlier stages in Asia than in the U.S.”

“Venture capitalists use a multistage financing approach that provides funding in [stages]. This allows VC to stop funding if specific benchmarks are not met, or if it becomes apparent that the firm is not going to succeed,” Clayton and colleagues (2018) noted. Venture capitalists and angel investors with expert technological skills may act as intermediaries that provide access to both customers and suppliers.

Angel investors

  • Provide early stage funding
  • Offer business advice and mentoring

Angel investors “are individual investors who invest in smaller amounts and at an earlier, riskier stage of startup development, which helps to provide proof of concept for scientific discoveries. The total amount of startup financing provided by angels is greater than the amount provided by VCs,” the authors explained. “Angels are often experienced entrepreneurs with technology expertise, and offer advice and mentoring for an indefinite amount of time. Beneficial for commercializing science, angels also have much longer time horizons than VC as they do not have to exit at some point on behalf of other investors, yet like VC they prefer to be located close to startups in which they invest.”

Public funding programs

  • Offer long-term support
  • Signal quality for private financing

Government has taken an active role in supporting science and innovation for over half a century, though direct public support for entrepreneurship is more recent (Clayton et al.,2018). Public funding programs, “such as the U.S. Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) program, which provides highly competitive grants to develop technology for federal agencies, have operated since the 1980s. Such programs operate outside the U.S., as well.”

Crowdfunding platforms

  • Are recession-proof
  • Enable inventors to gain immediate product feedback
  • Support idea-sharing

Crowdfunding platforms are “the newest – and least understood – practice in entrepreneurial finance,” the authors noted. Crowdfunding emerged after the 2008 recession, when bank finance became less available and has become more structured with time, though equity crowdfunding standards are slow to develop in many countries.

“Crowdfunding platforms allow individual or pooled investments in firms or projects, usually called campaigns. The use of web-based platforms offers an opportunity to describe the science underlying a project and to reach a larger set of potential investors than possible through the angel-funding model. Crowdfunding models also differ in how funders receive compensation. Donation models do not provide compensation for investors and usually benefit nonprofits or charities. Reward models offer gifts in return for investment. Pre-purchase models provide investors with the product in which they invested. In lending models, investors receive returns following typical borrow-lender relationships. Finally, equity models offer shares in profit, or ownership.”

Advancing research, impacting society

Why I go to Ghana so frequently: Advancing research, impacting society – Bro. Remy Nyukorong

Background

In 2016, there was a call for applied research from the German Federal Ministry of Economic Cooperation and Development (BMZ) based on the priority/focus area, “Good governance / decentralisation: increasing tax revenues and strengthening domestic accountability, promoting participation in local decision-making, improving living conditions through effective local governments”. The sustainable development goals made up an overall thematic framework for the applied research. To meet the eligibility criteria, I had to collaborate with the University of Cape Coast (Institute for Oil & Gas Studies), Regent University College of Science and Technology (School of Business and Leadership) and Erasmus Research Institute of Management (Centre for Leadership Studies) to develop the research proposal; as I could only submit applications through a university or a research-based institution. In this way, we established a consortium research team through a trilateral agreement. Together with this core consortium, we contributed actively preparing both the Phase 1 (field research) and Phase 2 (intervention mapping) applications. They selected our proposal, so we could carry out Phase 1 – a precondition for phase 2.

Data gathering, analyses and findings (Phase 1: 2017-2018)

We considered support a critical part of research capacity strengthening of the partner institutions. Therefore, we trained five MPhil students who assisted in data gathering and analyses for their direct input to the project.  We evaluated challenges faced by multinational oil and gas companies in the western region of Ghana through various corporate data we gained access to, observations and interviews with company executives, mining experts, government authorities and community representatives, and group discussions in villages.

We embraced teamwork, because social problems are never one-dimensional, and can never be solved through mono disciplinary approaches. It is my experience that research and education are always team efforts. You get interesting and relevant findings, when you work from a strong disciplinary orientation towards a common language, a common goal.

The essential findings of the research showed a poor engagement of communities and stakeholders by the multinational oil and gas companies operating in the western region. This was consistent with previous research findings in similar contexts that where communities and stakeholders are poorly engaged, marginalised or excluded from the dialogue in the extractive industry development process, they are almost certain to oppose the development. As the conflict escalates, the use of strategies of violence as a coercive measure against the company, and a means for addressing old grievances and mounting opposition against the government, are likely.

Intervention Project (Phase 2: 2019-2021)

Preparing for such challenges in the early stages, and responding to community concerns was crucial to ensuring that operations at the centre of Ghana’s oil boom are genuinely inclusive, mitigating conflict with local communities.  Early engagement provides opportunities to build the social license and mitigate against social risk and local impacts. Mining communities, particularly those in the Western region of Ghana, have experienced high levels of conflict surrounding oil and gas extraction activities in the region. The local communities have felt exploited and side-lined from both mine decision-making and profit. Hence, this intervention project is to help the multinational companies (engaged in the extractive sector) and their stakeholders to find common ground and build long-term, sustainable partnerships.

The intervention logic and the underlying theory of change is that if youth are involved and fully engaged in decision-making as valued stakeholders in community collaboration and if young people and their communities are given opportunities to engage in dialogue with each other and with extraction company representatives, then young people will seek legitimate and conflict-lessening methods to express their grievances. Thus, the Project seeks to strengthen institutions, capacities, policies and regulatory environment, voice and participation within the extractive sector through the bottom-up approach, engaging various levels of stakeholders in the decision-making process. This could be a positive start in avoiding future resource-driven conflicts. The development of the extractive industry can enable increased use of resource rents to foster the development of the country’s infrastructure and human capital, contributing to the development of other sectors. For instance, a strategy to build strong linkages between Ghana’s extractive industry and the rest of the economy can contribute to the development of its small-scale private sector, creating jobs and improving the welfare of its people.

We design this collaborative project to build a solid foundation on which Ghana’s extractive sectors can be efficiently and transparently managed to benefit its citizens. The project is aimed at enhancing knowledge and skills of policy makers and technicians, in the application of administrative and regulatory mechanisms of the extractive sectors but with the specific focus on the oil and gas sector.  We do that by addressing how collaboration and co-creation with societal partners, both local and external, is needed to ensure that essential insights and breakthroughs in mono and multidisciplinary research create value for society.

This two-year (2019-2021) intervention project will receive technical and financial help from the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), International Alert (IA), the Danida Fellowship Centre (DFC), Stanley Thomas Johnson Foundation (STJF) and the German Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development (BMZ).

Project kick-off meetings

From January 20 to February 16, 2019, the consortium partners, both local and international, held some preparatory meetings in Accra. We discussed the project objectives, work packages, process and the different project phases. A lively exchange between the participants followed.

In each meeting with local partners, we also discussed the partnership agreement and prepared a guide of good practices for implementing the project. In addition, we discussed administrative tasks and financial issues. Other topics we deliberated on included quality needs assessment analyses, common ground approach to stakeholder engagement, and the design of training modules. All the local partners were enthusiastic about the project.

We scheduled the next meeting to take place in June 2019. It will be the official kick-off of the project: rolling out in five regions involving twenty-five selected districts.  During this period, project partners will deliberate on stakeholder engagement. Based on the quadruple helix model, each partner will bring together a multi-sectorial group of stakeholders and involve this group in the project through meetings, participation in thematic seminars and study visits. Together with local stakeholders, each partner will then create an action plan to improve their addressed policy instrument. During this second meeting, we shall organise an intensive stakeholder mapping workshop to enable partners identify the main stakeholders in the regions (i.e. selected districts=25).

Concluding remarks

I am happy that the practical implications of a research finding can be implemented for the solution of a real problem., the impact and relevance of a scientific paper are precisely their application either to expand a concrete scientific field or for the solution to a practical problem. Societal value is the destination. So, “it’s not either/or, it’s both research and positive impact. They are inseparable.” We aim our work at fulfilling both purposes.

My New Post

The Meaningful Patterns of Dreams: A New Study

A brief update on a study of the dreams of a former religious cult member.

A new article shows that many important aspects of a person’s waking life concerns can be clearly identified in the word usage patterns of her dreams.  The article is titled “The meaningful continuities between dreaming and waking: Results of a blind analysis of a woman’s thirty-year dream journal,” and I have just finished and sent a revised draft to the journal Dreaming, which will publish it sometime in 2018.

The participant in this study, “Beverly,” is a fascinating person in many ways.  As the article describes, she was a member of a religious cult for many years, then left the group after a series of violent conflicts.  Her dreams chronicle her life during the period when she was a member of the group and immediately afterwards; this is incredibly interesting material from a research perspective, and my article is just the first effort to begin exploring Beverly’s collection of dreams.

Her journals include more than 6,000 reports, of which only a subset of about 1,000 was analyzed for my project (all of which are currently available for further study in the Sleep and Dream Database).  Right now she is working on transcribing her handwritten dream journals into a format that can be studied using digital tools of analysis.  Beverly is at least as excited as I am about this project, and we will both be making presentations at a research panel at the upcoming annual conference in June 2018 in Scottsdale, Arizona. More on that later.

Here is the abstract for the article:

This paper reports the findings of a new exercise in the “blind analysis” of a long dream series.  The study focused on 940 dreams from a woman (“Beverly”) who kept a regular dream journal for thirty years. Four subsets of her dreams (from 1986, 1996, 2006, and 2016) were analyzed using a digital word search template, then predictions were made about Beverly’s waking life based on the word usage frequencies of her dreams. Twenty-six predictions were made, of which Beverly confirmed twenty-three as accurate.

The correct inferences included aspects of Beverly’s emotional temperament, preoccupations, relationships, financial concerns, physical health, and cultural interests, especially revolving around religion and spirituality.  The waking-dreaming continuities identified by the blind analysis method in this study strongly support the claims by Hall, Domhoff, Schredl, and others that patterns in dream content have meaningful connections with people’s concerns, interests, and activities in waking life.

source – kellybulkeley.org/

This is my New Post

Peacebuilding and sustaining peace in Ghana

Introduction: Situation analysis

According to the Global Peace Index (GPI), Ghana has been a stable refuge in sub-Saharan Africa, this being a region that has historically being afflicted with violent conflict. In 2012, Ghana was ranked as the 5th most peaceful State in Sub-Saharan Africa, making it a haven to refugees from the region such as Cote d’Ivoire, Liberia, Sierra Leone, and Sudan.

Ghana’s description as a basically peaceful nation is also mentioned in Ghana’s medium-term national development policy framework: Ghana Shared Growth and Development Agenda (GSGDA), 2012-2013.

“The general stable and peaceful atmosphere which prevails in the country provides an opportunity to focus on the implementation policies that are required for accelerated growth of the economy and the creation of quality jobs.”

In spite of the global recognition as a relatively stable nation, Ghana has a myriad of perennial conflicts which have at times erupted into violent clashes and if not tackled have the potential of dislocating the nation. There still remains a number of critical conflict drivers such as land and natural resources, chieftaincy, ethnic, religious and socio-cultural disputes.

Many of Ghana’s internal conflicts are initiated by minor disputes at the community level that erupt into violence. Ethnic conflicts, mostly over succession issues in traditional leadership settings or over land use surface periodically. A recent example erupted in February 2010 around Bawku, a flashpoint area, over a long-standing chieftaincy disputes that led to deaths and displacements. While there is no state-driven discrimination against single ethnic groups, the politicization of ethnic loyalties remains a disturbing and potentially dangerous feature of Ghana politics (Bertelsmann Stiftung’s Transformation Index (BTI); Ghana Country Report 2012).

The Ghana Shared Growth and Development Agenda (GSGDA) II, 2014-2017, identifies the need to put an end to inter-and intra-ethnic conflicts, Chieftaincy and political party disputes, which underscoring that left unchecked, conflicts will continue to hinder national cohesion and economic growth.

Thus, Ghana needs to work better together to sustain peace at all stages of conflict and in all its dimensions. Sustaining peace is crucial to preventing the outbreak, escalation, continuation and recurrence of conflict. It is imperative to acknowledge that sustaining peace should be generally understood as a goal and a process to build a common vision of a society, making sure that the needs of all segments of the population are considered.

Sustaining peace is a shared task and responsibility of Government and all other national stakeholders. It is the primary responsibility of the Government and civil society in identifying, driving and directing priorities, strategies and activities for sustaining peace. It should also be stressed here that inclusivity is key to advancing national peacebuilding processes and objectives.

Efforts to sustain peace are necessary not only once conflict had broken out but also long beforehand, through the prevention of conflict and addressing its root causes. In too many places, the cohesion of societies and the well-being of people are at risk. Building a common vision of society must involve paying attention to the causes of those problems.

The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development contains the blueprint of the common vision of society towards which the world is trying to move. Inclusive and sustainable development not only is an end in itself but also happens to be the best defence against the risks of violent conflict. The 2030 Agenda also contains the promise to leave no one behind in the quest to build such societies.

Typical top-down approaches to peace are ineffectual and unsustainable. “Peace is like a tree; it grows from the bottom up, and community-initiated peacebuilding programs are usually more effective, and allow for more genuine inclusion of traditionally marginalized groups,” (Youssef Mahmoud, IPI Senior Advisor)

Empirical research has demonstrated the key contribution of childhood education in building the foundations for sustaining peace. “Schools that educate children to be for rather than against one another, that teach how to enlarge the ‘us’ to make room for the ‘them,’ that develop abilities to resolve conflicts constructively rather than destructive are the hallmarks of peaceful societies.”

Operational and policy coherence to strengthen support to peacebuilding and sustaining peace

Leadership, accountability and capacity in supporting peacebuilding and sustaining peace

It is important that those in leadership positions in the field receive assistance from Headquarters, including guidance, training, surge capacities, peer-to-peer support and the delegated authority to take calculated risks in support of national priorities – collaborative leadership

Partnerships for sustaining peace

  • An ecosystem of partners working in support of Governments is critical for sustaining peace. Regional and district-level organizations play a key role in the peaceful settlement of disputes, including through preventive diplomacy, confidence-building and mediation efforts, preventing violent extremism, peacekeeping and peacebuilding. They also share knowledge, analytical capacity and strong local networks.
  • Community-level engagement is another critical component of sustaining peace. Developing participatory approaches that involve civil society and local communities is instrumental in peacebuilding as well as in preventing violent extremism and addressing the conditions conducive to terrorism. This is already taking place in different forms in many contexts but should be continuous and systematic.
  • Civil society organizations should include a focus on youth-led organizations, by providing space for youth participation in programming. It is also imperative to ensure an enabling environment for youth organizations and internal expertise to engage with youth.
  • Women’s organizations and networks also have important contributions to make in enabling women’s leadership and participation in conflict prevention and ensuring the sustainability of women’s grass-roots peacebuilding. Women’s participation improves prevention efforts and overall security, especially on issues such as the prevention of violent extremism.

Monitoring and evaluation

At a minimum, on a yearly basis, the following monitoring activities should be carried out in accordance with UNDP Programme and Operations Policies and Procedures (POPP).

  • Field visits – this serves the purpose of results validation and should provide latest information on progress of annual reporting preparations. These visits should be documented through brief and action-oriented reports submitted within the week of return to the office.
  • Risk log
  • Project-lesson-learned log activated and regularly updated to envision ongoing learning and adaptation.
  • An issue logs.
  • Monitoring schedule plan.
  • Quarterly and annual reviews.

Conclusion

The scale and nature of the challenge of sustaining peace calls for closer strategic and operational partnerships among the Government and other key stakeholders, including national, regional and district-level organizations, civil society organizations, women’s groups, youth organizations and the private sector, considering national priorities and policies. In today’s complex world, those partnerships need to harness the energies of all sectors of society.

References

National Peace Council (NPC). Ghana Country Report 2012

Ghana Shared Growth and Development Agenda (GSGDA) I, 2012-2013

Ghana Shared Growth and Development Agenda (GSGDA) II, 2014-2017

Institute for Economics and Peace (EPI). Global Peace Index 2018

UNDP Programme and Operations Policies and Procedures (POPP) https://popp.undp.org/SitePages/POPPRoot.aspx

UNSSC Knowledge Centre for Sustainable Development. The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. https://www.unssc.org/sites/unssc.org/files/2030_agenda_for_sustainable_development_kcsd_primer_en.pdf (Accessed 1 October 2018)

Value of Business to Society

The true and authentic value of a business to society is creating products and services and not about making profits.

This is particularly true today because the actual epicentre of innovation has shifted from individual researchers and scientific laboratories to enterprises, a perspective that also echoes with the position of thought leaders at the recent “Oracle Open World.”

The role of lead innovator comes with huge responsibility, and along with it, an opportunity to develop creative ideas for improvement and advancement. That is, progress that looks beyond narrow interests and short-termism towards the greater good.

The question then is: how can we integrate the quest of such progress within the organizational framework? In my opinion, there are three ways. That is, (a) by innovating with products and processes, (b) by designing new and better customer experiences, and (c) by reinventing business models.

For example, think about how technology innovation in the form of a mobile banking platform has offered financial access to the huge, previously unbanked populations in the developing world. Or, consider how advances in intelligent healthcare systems have made it possible to provide remote care to geriatric patients. And finally, let’s take the example of the “Global Delivery Model” which has been influential in developing entire regions in the emerging world into hubs of innovation, generating new employment opportunities for many young people while providing unmatched business advantage to businesses in the developed economies.

The above ideas stick out not only for the observable benefits they gain for the parent company, but also for the role they play in the local community, sustainability and society as a whole.

What is astonishing is that time and again organizations do not recognise and appreciate the importance of those moments, which will eventually continue to create history. They fail to recognise a “not-so-obvious” breakthrough for what it is: a small but major building block of not just business growth, but profound and pervasive progress.

Thus far, such progress has certainly been an unexpected outcome of business. It is time it became the fundamental reason to stay alive in business.

 

 

My New Post

For many organizations, human resources are their greatest asset. Indeed, organizational performance and organizations’ ability to gain a competitive advantage is often critically contingent on the effective management of people. Leadership is a key element in this process. Leaders may motivate employees to excellent performance and mobilise employees for the organization’s mission and vision. Leaders may also be a primary source of conflict and demotivation, however. Understanding how leadership can bring out the best in people as well as where leadership can go wrong therefore is of critical importance to successful organizational functioning.

Lecture Hall - Computer1

Therefore, my ‘mission’ is to contribute to this understanding through fundamental as well as applied research in leadership. Based on this, I try to conduct field research in collaboration with a variety of organizations with the hope that these studies will allow me to develop models of effective leadership that highlights leaders’ role as influencing agents and motivators of followers, and that emphasise such aspects of leadership as leaders’ vision, servant leadership, team leadership, and leaders’ ability to represent the shared identity of the team or organization. I am keen to apply these models to help organizations resolve leadership issues and increase organizations’ understanding of the role of leadership in their effective functioning, and invite interested organizations to contact.

This is my new post

Thursday, 16th August 2018

Today was a sightseeing outing. We left Denekamp immediately after our breakfast at about 09:16 hours.

MEYER WERFT, PAPENBURG-GERMANY

The first place we visited was MEYER WERFT, (in Papenburg), a shipbuilding company in Germany.

Floatation Classroom

Founded in 1795, Papenburg-based MEYER WERFT has meanwhile been owned by the seventh generation of the Meyer family. This well-established company has some 3,300 employees. MEYER WERFT’s extensive production program covers a wide range of ship types, from cruise ships, gas tankers and passenger ferries. In order to stay successful in worldwide competition, production technology has been continuously extended. Today, MEYER WERFT has the most modern production premises in the shipbuilding industry.

Meyer Werft Shipyard

Building cruise ships is a particularly complex task compared to other industries. One cruise ship is a highly complex, large-scale project that must satisfy customer requirements as well as meet stringent safety regulations. Each cruise ship is made of more than 10 million individual parts and assemblies, compared to about one million parts for today’s largest passenger airplanes and about 10,000 parts for a car. The complexity, diversity and large volume of data involved require efficient solutions to design and build ships that stand out from those of competitors. Meyer Werft can efficiently manage this complexity while ensuring high quality standards that, ultimately, help its cruise line customers offer a best-in-class passenger experience.

It was a very enjoyable two-hour tour, including a view of the ships in progress. It is an insightful experience and a well worth visit. A perfect place for a company of friends.

LUNCH

After the shipyard tour, we had our Lunch together at the Gasthof Tepe restaurant in Aschendorf, about 6 km away from Papenburg, Germany.

BOURTANGE FORTRESS

The next place tourist site we visited was the Bourtange fortress – also referred to as the fortress that was never conquered – a unique historical defences which is without comparison.

Rich in history, Vesting Bourtange dates back to 1580 when Willem van Oranje ordered an entrenchment be built with five bastions near the Dutch-German border. Build on a sandy ridge or ‘tange’ (in Dutch) it was completed in 1593. Over the centuries it was continually reinforced but as over time it eventually lost its military status and was dismantled by 1851. Since then it has grown into an agricultural village which is teeming with history. Bourtange is located southeast of Groningen, not far from the German border, making it a fun day trip if you are in the area. Its cobblestone roads, historic canons and wooden drawbridges allow your imagination to wander back in time.

 

We spend our time walking around the high ridges that line the village, a water canal on one side and the town in the centre. Stunning views and fields as far as the eye could see made us feel as if we really were protected from the rest of the world. Visiting Bourtange, you walk through the so called ‘Vriesse gate’ or ‘Münsterse gate’, depending from which way you enter, following the road to the picturesque Marketplace. This square is surrounded by fourteen 300 years old lemon trees. Along with museums, Bourtange also has an Inn which would allow you to actually stay overnight and enjoy the fortress for a little bit longer. We made sure to visit the “candle maker” and also enjoyed watching the residents having their relaxation in the gardens. We eventually made our way to the centre square where there were several restaurants available.

Bourtange Street Walk

The tour continued with the Protestant Church, the Jewish Synagogue and windmill and then a little relax time watching the swans go by. The video makes it look massive, but in all reality, it was quite a bit smaller than we expected. In this small cosy village (Bourtange), the present day and past centuries go together perfectly giving you a sense of appreciation of one’s own historical and cultural background. Regardless it was a beautiful place to visit and a great way to expose young people to history. No theme parks, no rides, just exploring and wandering the streets of this century’s old fortress. I highly recommend Bourtange for family outing.

SUPPER

We left Bourtange at 17:38 hours arriving in De Lutte-Loser at about 18:50 hours, where we took our supper together in the Cafe-Restaurant Keet’n Zwart.

BACK TO GENERAL CHAPTER VENUE

At 21:00 hours we left the restaurant (Keet’n Zwart) and arriving in Denekamp at 21:20 hours. That was how we spent the day.

BRIEF REFLECTION ON BEING TOGETHER

OUTING is one of the ways of expressing our fraternal solidarity with one another. As it is said in our Constitutions: “being together in hours of relaxation… is a sign of unity” (Article 45).

Thanks a lot, to Bro. Lo Koeleman for the practical arrangements he put in place to make the outing successful and joyful being together.

 

 

My New Post

Thursday, 16th August 2018

Today was a sightseeing outing. We left Denekamp immediately after our breakfast at about 09:16 hours.

MEYER WERFT, PAPENBURG-GERMANY

The first place we visited was MEYER WERFT, (in Papenburg), a shipbuilding company in Germany.

Floatation Classroom

Founded in 1795, Papenburg-based MEYER WERFT has meanwhile been owned by the seventh generation of the Meyer family. This well-established company has some 3,300 employees. MEYER WERFT’s extensive production program covers a wide range of ship types, from cruise ships, gas tankers and passenger ferries. In order to stay successful in worldwide competition, production technology has been continuously extended. Today, MEYER WERFT has the most modern production premises in the shipbuilding industry.

Meyer Werft Shipyard

Building cruise ships is a particularly complex task compared to other industries. One cruise ship is a highly complex, large-scale project that must satisfy customer requirements as well as meet stringent safety regulations. Each cruise ship is made of more than 10 million individual parts and assemblies, compared to about one million parts for today’s largest passenger airplanes and about 10,000 parts for a car. The complexity, diversity and large volume of data involved require efficient solutions to design and build ships that stand out from those of competitors. Meyer Werft can efficiently manage this complexity while ensuring high quality standards that, ultimately, help its cruise line customers offer a best-in-class passenger experience.

It was a very enjoyable two-hour tour, including a view of the ships in progress. It is an insightful experience and a well worth visit. A perfect place for a company of friends.

LUNCH

After the shipyard tour, we had our Lunch together at the Gasthof Tepe restaurant in Aschendorf, about 6 km away from Papenburg, Germany.

BOURTANGE FORTRESS

The next place tourist site we visited was the Bourtange fortress – also referred to as the fortress that was never conquered – a unique historical defences which is without comparison.

Rich in history, Vesting Bourtange dates back to 1580 when Willem van Oranje ordered an entrenchment be built with five bastions near the Dutch-German border. Build on a sandy ridge or ‘tange’ (in Dutch) it was completed in 1593. Over the centuries it was continually reinforced but as over time it eventually lost its military status and was dismantled by 1851. Since then it has grown into an agricultural village which is teeming with history. Bourtange is located southeast of Groningen, not far from the German border, making it a fun day trip if you are in the area. Its cobblestone roads, historic canons and wooden drawbridges allow your imagination to wander back in time.

Market Square

We spend our time walking around the high ridges that line the village, a water canal on one side and the town in the centre. Stunning views and fields as far as the eye could see made us feel as if we really were protected from the rest of the world. Visiting Bourtange, you walk through the so called ‘Vriesse gate’ or ‘Münsterse gate’, depending from which way you enter, following the road to the picturesque Marketplace. This square is surrounded by fourteen 300 years old lemon trees. Along with museums, Bourtange also has an Inn which would allow you to actually stay overnight and enjoy the fortress for a little bit longer. We made sure to visit the “candle maker” and also enjoyed watching the residents having their relaxation in the gardens. We eventually made our way to the centre square where there were several restaurants available.

Bourtange Street Walk

The tour continued with the Protestant Church, the Jewish Synagogue and windmill and then a little relax time watching the swans go by. The video makes it look massive, but in all reality, it was quite a bit smaller than we expected. In this small cosy village (Bourtange), the present day and past centuries go together perfectly giving you a sense of appreciation of one’s own historical and cultural background. Regardless it was a beautiful place to visit and a great way to expose young people to history. No theme parks, no rides, just exploring and wandering the streets of this century’s old fortress. I highly recommend Bourtange for family outing.

SUPPER

We left Bourtange at 17:38 hours arriving in De Lutte-Loser at about 18:50 hours, where we took our supper together in the Cafe-Restaurant Keet’n Zwart.

BACK TO GENERAL CHAPTER VENUE

At 21:00 hours we left the restaurant (Keet’n Zwart) and arriving in Denekamp at 21:20 hours. That was how we spent the day.

BRIEF REFLECTION ON BEING TOGETHER

OUTING is one of the ways of expressing our fraternal solidarity with one another. As it is said in our Constitutions: “being together in hours of relaxation… is a sign of unity” (Article 45).

Thanks a lot, to Bro. Lo Koeleman for the practical arrangements he put in place to make the outing successful and joyful being together.

 

 

This is my new post

Thursday, 16th August 2018

Today was a sightseeing outing. We left Denekamp immediately after our breakfast at about 09:16 hours.

MEYER WERFT, PAPENBURG-GERMANY

The first place we visited was MEYER WERFT, (in Papenburg), a shipbuilding company in Germany.

Floatation Classroom

Founded in 1795, Papenburg-based MEYER WERFT has meanwhile been owned by the seventh generation of the Meyer family. This well-established company has some 3,300 employees. MEYER WERFT’s extensive production program covers a wide range of ship types, from cruise ships, gas tankers and passenger ferries. In order to stay successful in worldwide competition, production technology has been continuously extended. Today, MEYER WERFT has the most modern production premises in the shipbuilding industry.

Meyer Werft Shipyard

Building cruise ships is a particularly complex task compared to other industries. One cruise ship is a highly complex, large-scale project that must satisfy customer requirements as well as meet stringent safety regulations. Each cruise ship is made of more than 10 million individual parts and assemblies, compared to about one million parts for today’s largest passenger airplanes and about 10,000 parts for a car. The complexity, diversity and large volume of data involved require efficient solutions to design and build ships that stand out from those of competitors. Meyer Werft can efficiently manage this complexity while ensuring high quality standards that, ultimately, help its cruise line customers offer a best-in-class passenger experience.

It was a very enjoyable two-hour tour, including a view of the ships in progress. It is an insightful experience and a well worth visit. A perfect place for a company of friends.

LUNCH

After the shipyard tour, we had our Lunch together at the Gasthof Tepe restaurant in Aschendorf, about 6 km away from Papenburg, Germany.

BOURTANGE FORTRESS

The next place tourist site we visited was the Bourtange fortress – also referred to as the fortress that was never conquered – a unique historical defences which is without comparison.

Rich in history, Vesting Bourtange dates back to 1580 when Willem van Oranje ordered an entrenchment be built with five bastions near the Dutch-German border. Build on a sandy ridge or ‘tange’ (in Dutch) it was completed in 1593. Over the centuries it was continually reinforced but as over time it eventually lost its military status and was dismantled by 1851. Since then it has grown into an agricultural village which is teeming with history. Bourtange is located southeast of Groningen, not far from the German border, making it a fun day trip if you are in the area. Its cobblestone roads, historic canons and wooden drawbridges allow your imagination to wander back in time.

Market Square

We spend our time walking around the high ridges that line the village, a water canal on one side and the town in the centre. Stunning views and fields as far as the eye could see made us feel as if we really were protected from the rest of the world. Visiting Bourtange, you walk through the so called ‘Vriesse gate’ or ‘Münsterse gate’, depending from which way you enter, following the road to the picturesque Marketplace. This square is surrounded by fourteen 300 years old lemon trees. Along with museums, Bourtange also has an Inn which would allow you to actually stay overnight and enjoy the fortress for a little bit longer. We made sure to visit the “candle maker” and also enjoyed watching the residents having their relaxation in the gardens. We eventually made our way to the centre square where there were several restaurants available.

Bourtange Street Walk

The tour continued with the Protestant Church, the Jewish Synagogue and windmill and then a little relax time watching the swans go by. The video makes it look massive, but in all reality, it was quite a bit smaller than we expected. In this small cosy village (Bourtange), the present day and past centuries go together perfectly giving you a sense of appreciation of one’s own historical and cultural background. Regardless it was a beautiful place to visit and a great way to expose young people to history. No theme parks, no rides, just exploring and wandering the streets of this century’s old fortress. I highly recommend Bourtange for family outing.

SUPPER

We left Bourtange at 17:38 hours arriving in De Lutte-Loser at about 18:50 hours, where we took our supper together in the Cafe-Restaurant Keet’n Zwart.

BACK TO GENERAL CHAPTER VENUE

At 21:00 hours we left the restaurant (Keet’n Zwart) and arriving in Denekamp at 21:20 hours. That was how we spent the day.

BRIEF REFLECTION ON BEING TOGETHER

OUTING is one of the ways of expressing our fraternal solidarity with one another. As it is said in our Constitutions: “being together in hours of relaxation… is a sign of unity” (Article 45).

Thanks a lot, to Bro. Lo Koeleman for the practical arrangements he put in place to make the outing successful and joyful being together.